Topiramate monotherapy use in women with and without epilepsy: pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate fetal or neonatal outcomes (with a focus on major congenital anomalies) with use of topiramate monotherapy and to examine whether differences occurred in the reporting and patterns of these outcomes for pregnant women with and without epilepsy. METHODS: Spontaneous, postmarketing reports involving women who used topiramate monotherapy during pregnancy from 18 July 1995 (International Birth Date of topiramate) through 30 April 2011 were retrieved from the sponsor's (Janssen Research & Development, LLC) Global Medical Safety database. All formulations for topiramate, used as monotherapy, were selected for the analysis. Monotherapy was defined as any situation where no other AED was listed in the pregnancy case report, either as a suspect or concomitant medication, regardless of indication. Results were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 1163 cases of women who used topiramate monotherapy during pregnancy (for any indication) were retrieved from the Global Medical Safety database. Since some women used topiramate for more than one indication, there were a total of 1199 reported indications for topiramate monotherapy, which were primarily for treatment of epilepsy (n=599), accounting for half of the indications, and migraine prophylaxis (n=240, 20.0%). Out of 1163 cases, pregnancy outcome was reported in 50.6% (n=589). Live birth was the most frequently reported outcome, regardless of indication (epilepsy, 78.8% [312/396]; prophylaxis of migraine, 59. 3% [48/81]; other indication, 64.4% [85/132]). Cleft lip or palate anomalies (epilepsy, n=15; migraine, n=2; other indication, n=4; and indication not reported, n=2), limb, hand, or other skeletal anomalies (epilepsy, n=13; migraine, n=2; other indication, n=0; and indication not reported, n=1), and respiratory or cardiovascular anomalies (epilepsy, n=12; migraine, n=1; other indication, n=1; and indication not reported, n=2) were the most often reported major fetal or neonatal anomalies. More reported major fetal or neonatal anomalies occurred in patients being treated for epilepsy (53/79 anomaly-indication pairs) compared with patients being treated for migraine prophylaxis (10/79 anomaly-indication pairs). CONCLUSION: Although incidence rates cannot be calculated based on spontaneous adverse event reporting, this summary of reported pregnancy and neonatal outcomes with use of topiramate monotherapy suggests that the risk for major fetal or neonatal anomalies may differ based on the indication for topiramate.

Evaluating the postmarketing experience of risperidone use during pregnancy: pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A significant number of women of childbearing age have schizophrenia or other psychoses. This means that there is a considerable risk of in utero exposure to risperidone due to maternal use. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in utero exposure to the atypical antipsychotic risperidone is associated with poor pregnancy and fetal/neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A search of the Benefit Risk Management Worldwide Safety database, using a selection of preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities, was performed to identify all cases of pregnancy or fetal/neonatal outcomes reported in association with risperidone treatment from its first market launch (international birth date, 1 June 1993) to 31 December 2004. The main measures were the patterns and reporting rates of pregnancy (stillbirth and spontaneous and induced abortion) and fetal/neonatal outcomes (congenital abnormalities, perinatal syndromes and withdrawal symptoms) for women administered risperidone during pregnancy. RESULTS: Overall, 713 pregnancies were identified in women who were receiving risperidone. Data were considered prospective in 516 of these, and retrospective in the remaining 197 cases. The majority of the known adverse pregnancy and fetal/neonatal outcomes were retrospectively reported. Of the 68 prospectively reported pregnancies with a known outcome, organ malformations and spontaneous abortions occurred 3.8% and 16.9% (when the 15 induced abortions were excluded from the denominator, as they were predominantly undertaken for nonmedical reasons), respectively, a finding consistent with background rates of the general population. There were 12 retrospectively reported pregnancies involving major organ malformations, the most frequently reported of which affected the heart, brain, lip and/or palate. There were 37 retrospectively reported pregnancies involving perinatal syndromes, of which 21 cases involved behavioural or motor disorders. In particular, there was a cluster of cases reporting tremor, jitteriness, irritability, feeding problems and somnolence, which may represent a withdrawal-emergent syndrome. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive review of the Benefit Risk Management Worldwide Safety database for case reports of risperidone exposure during pregnancy represents the largest ever published dataset documenting pregnancy outcomes for women taking the atypical antipsychotic risperidone. It indicates that in utero exposure to risperidone does not appear to increase the risk of spontaneous abortions, structural malformations and fetal teratogenic risk above that of the general population. Self-limited extrapyramidal effects in neonates were observed after maternal exposure to risperidone during the third trimester of pregnancy. Risperidone should only be used during pregnancy if the benefits outweigh the potential risks.